[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Info
  Chairman
   Dr. Ghazaleh Doostparast Torshizi
   Editor in Chief
   Dr. Ali Gholami
   Executive editor
  Dr. Toktam Mohammadi-Moghaddam
  Publisher
 
 Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences
 
..
:: Reviewers' Instructions ::
 | Post date: 2026/02/19 | 

Reviewers’ Considerations for HAP Articles

Ethical Considerations

  1. Confidentiality:
    • Treat submitted manuscripts as confidential documents. Do not share or discuss the content with others.
    • Safeguard the authors’ intellectual property by maintaining confidentiality throughout the review process.
  2. Conflict of Interest:
    • Disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may affect your impartiality during the review.
    • Transparency ensures unbiased evaluation.
  3. Timeliness:
    • Review manuscripts promptly and provide constructive feedback within the stipulated time frame.
    • Timely reviews contribute to efficient editorial processes.
  4. Objectivity:
    • Evaluate manuscripts objectively, focusing on scientific merit rather than personal biases.
    • Your assessment should be fair and evidence-based.

Review Process

  1. Initial Assessment:
    • Evaluate the manuscript’s relevance, originality, and adherence to the journal’s scope.
    • Consider whether the research addresses important clinical questions or contributes significantly to medical knowledge.
  2. Methodology and Rigor:
    • Assess the study design, sample size, statistical methods, and data quality.
    • Look for any potential biases or limitations.
  3. Results and Interpretation:
    • Evaluate the clarity and accuracy of the reported results.
    • Consider whether the conclusions are supported by the data.
  4. References and Citations:
    • Check the appropriateness and completeness of the reference list.
    • Ensure proper citation of relevant literature.
  5. Language and Clarity:
    • Pay attention to the clarity of writing, organization, and overall readability.
    • Suggest improvements if needed.
Vancouver Style:
    • The Vancouver Style is commonly used in the biomedical and health sciences fields. It emphasizes numerical citations within the text, which correspond to a numbered list of references at the end of the article.
    • In-text citations are typically represented as superscript numbers, like this.
    • The reference list should be organized numerically, following the order of appearance in the text.
    • When citing journal articles, include the author(s), title of the article, journal name (abbreviated according to the Index Medicus), volume, issue, page range, and publication year.
Remember, as a reviewer, your attention to detail ensures that authors’ work aligns with these guidelines
 
  
Facilities
Related topics Related topics
Print version Print version
Send to friends Send to friends


CAPTCHA
::
View: 3 Time(s)   |   Print: 1 Time(s)   |   Email: 0 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
دیدگاه های سالمندی سالم Healthy Aging Perspectives
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 4740